Kling 1.5 vs Kling 1.0: What's New?

Kling 1.5 represents a significant upgrade from Kling 1.0, bringing improved quality, better motion physics, and enhanced consistency. This review examines what’s actually changed and whether the upgrade matters for your workflow.

Quick Version Comparison

Feature	Kling 1.0	Kling 1.5	Multic
Video Quality	Good	Excellent	N/A
Motion Physics	Good	Very Good	N/A
Face Quality	Inconsistent	Improved	N/A
Max Duration	5 min	5 min	N/A
Generation Speed	Standard	Improved	Instant
AI Images	No	No	Yes
AI Video	Yes	Yes	Yes
Comics/Webtoons	No	No	Yes
Visual Novels	No	No	Yes
Branching Stories	No	No	Yes
Real-time Collab	No	No	Yes
Publishing	No	No	Yes

What’s Actually New in Kling 1.5

Improved Video Quality

The most noticeable change is visual quality improvement:

• Better detail preservation: Fine details remain clearer throughout motion
• Improved color accuracy: Colors are more vibrant and accurate
• Enhanced lighting: More natural lighting transitions
• Reduced artifacts: Fewer visual glitches and distortions

In direct comparisons, Kling 1.5 output looks noticeably more polished than 1.0.

Better Motion Physics

Motion handling has improved significantly:

• More natural movement: Objects and characters move more realistically
• Better physics simulation: Gravity, momentum, and interaction feel right
• Improved flow: Motion is smoother throughout clips
• Reduced jitter: Less unnatural shaking or stuttering

Enhanced Face Quality

Faces were a weakness in 1.0. Kling 1.5 addresses this:

• More consistent faces: Characters maintain appearance better
• Reduced distortion: Less morphing during movement
• Better expressions: Subtle emotions render more naturally
• Improved eye tracking: Eyes move more realistically

Generation Speed

Processing time has decreased:

• Faster queue times: Results arrive sooner
• Better server optimization: More efficient processing
• Improved throughput: More generations per time period

Side-by-Side Comparison

Prompt: “Woman walking through garden, sunny day”

Kling 1.0 Results:

• Acceptable quality
• Some face inconsistency
• Occasional movement artifacts
• Good but not exceptional

Kling 1.5 Results:

• Noticeably sharper
• Face remains consistent
• Smooth, natural movement
• Approaches Runway quality

Prompt: “Man jumping over obstacle”

Kling 1.0 Results:

• Physics somewhat floaty
• Landing looks unnatural
• Some motion blur issues

Kling 1.5 Results:

• Convincing physics
• Natural landing motion
• Clean motion handling

Prompt: “Close-up conversation between two people”

Kling 1.0 Results:

• Faces occasionally morph
• Expressions limited
• Lip sync attempts awkward

Kling 1.5 Results:

• Faces more stable
• Better expression range
• Still not perfect lip sync, but improved

What Hasn’t Changed

Duration Limits

Maximum generation length remains at 5 minutes. This is still Kling’s major advantage over competitors.

Pricing Structure

Credit costs and subscription tiers remain similar. No significant price changes accompanied the upgrade.

Interface

The user interface and workflow remain essentially the same. Existing users won’t need to relearn anything.

Content Policies

Guidelines for acceptable content haven’t changed significantly.

Is the Upgrade Worth It?

For Existing Kling Users

Yes. The quality improvements are substantial, and there’s no additional cost. Simply select Kling 1.5 when generating.

For New Users

Kling 1.5 makes the platform more competitive with Runway. The value proposition is stronger than ever.

Compared to Runway

The gap has narrowed. Kling 1.5 approaches Runway quality while maintaining the 5-minute duration advantage and lower price.

Remaining Limitations

Queue Times

While improved, peak hour queues still exist. Patience remains necessary.

Not Quite Runway Quality

Runway Gen-3 still edges ahead in pure quality terms, especially for cinematic content.

Interface Polish

The user interface still isn’t as refined as Runway’s professional tools.

Character Consistency

While improved, maintaining exact character appearance across multiple generations remains challenging.

Best Practices for Kling 1.5

Use Image-to-Video

For character work, starting with a quality image produces the most consistent results.

Leverage the Duration

Take advantage of the 5-minute capability for longer scenes other tools can’t match.

Quality Over Quantity

Use high quality settings for important generations. The improvements show most at higher quality.

Clear Prompts

The better model responds better to specific, detailed prompts. Be explicit about what you want.

Why Multic Matters for Kling Users

Kling 1.5 generates better clips. Multic turns clips into complete creative works.

What Kling 1.5 provides:

• Improved video generation
• Longer duration than competitors
• Better quality at lower price

What Kling lacks:

• Story structure
• Character tracking
• Interactive elements
• Publishing platform

Multic Integration

For creators building stories:

• AI Images: Create consistent character references
• AI Video: Use Kling clips in larger narratives
• Visual Novels: Build character-driven stories
• Branching Stories: Add reader interaction
• Comics/Webtoons: Panel-based storytelling
• Real-time Collaboration: Team creation
• Publishing: Share directly with audiences

Generate your hero moments in Kling 1.5. Build complete experiences in Multic.

Verdict

Kling 1.5 delivers meaningful improvements over 1.0. Video quality, motion physics, and face rendering have all advanced noticeably. The upgrade narrows the gap with Runway while maintaining Kling’s advantages in duration and pricing.

For AI video generation, Kling 1.5 offers the best value proposition in the market.

For complete creative works, pair Kling with Multic to transform excellent video clips into engaging interactive narratives.

---

Ready to turn Kling videos into complete stories? Start on Multic and build narratives around your AI-generated content.

---

Related: Kling vs Runway, How to Use Kling AI, and Best AI Video Generators 2026